Which is better? 1 - Flood the numbers with as many calls as possible causing them to have to shut down the number 2 - Keep the line active, so that we can call them and mess with them - reverse into their machines etc…

It ALL works😂whatta mean😆

I employ a 3rd option: use a limited number of dialing bots to call them up and play sound effects until they willingly park their number. It’s not call flooding: it’s call pranking / harassing them. I do this every day at 8am EST and I typically take out 7 numbers, which come back online after ab…

I like your theroy😂. I just call til the cows come home. Mooooo000000OOOOO

How many channels does this take up ?

Both. Solidarity is the most important thing. I believe that a multi-prong approach works best and includes all of the above Personally, I believe that flooding toll-free numbers is very effective and it costs them a lot of money, the only language they seem to understand. But going after them fro…

I know either answer is controversial, but shutting down a number is very important. It costs the scammer money if they sent out an email campaign… It stops the current campaign. If you bait them, and they have 10 other people answering, there is possibly 9 victims being scammed… I do both… Il…

Came in late on this one; I was looking for opinions on why some say flooding doesn’t work. I agree that whatever causes scammers some heartburn is good, but I wonder how effective flooding is when so many numbers get answered by a robovoice and/or an AI “screener.” Once I get a scammer on the lin…

I am not a purist. If John Smith only knows how to make one phone call at a time, he is helping the cause by calling the scammer, wasting his time, and undermining the scammer’s morale by making him think he has a “sale” until the last second. If Jane Doe has a B.S. in Computer Science, has softwar…

Shutting down a number vs baiting?

General Discussion

ReconScammer 2022 年 12 月 24 日午後 10:27 31